“Training our employees like that won’t work. You have to be more strict with them. If they make a mistake, point it out! Point out their faults publicly to make them ashamed so they will improve.”
Certainly, this has never been a popular approach for motivation and constructive criticism highlighted in the Harvard Business Review, but this HAS BEEN told to me in several companies I have partnered with through Authentic Journeys in India. I learned the hard ways that some Indians tended to apply this strategy in a corporate situation. This was certainly the case in some of the 50 companies I consulted with in India. When I say I learned the hard way, I was also treated like a local. There were a few instances I was shamed by a manager in front of the group to get their desired outcome or to change my behavior.
And, it worked.
Yes, I changed my approach. It was not easy. I have adapted some of the Indian style and some of my American style into a unique approach. And, in a few instances, I had to learn to context switch, applying a harsher, more direct approach that I ever would in a corporate setting in the U.S. (The irony here is in most cross culture training programs it is said that Indians are indirect. While there are certainly situations that people in India are indirect, this is one exception.) I would not use this approach with Americans. NOT at all. It would not be motivating. In fact, they would be offended, and kick me out of the organization for not acting ‘professional,’ and, ironically, being too direct. It’s this very difference that I often try to teach in US culture training programs to Indians working with US counterparts. It’s a big learning curve and mindset change. Many often ask me in such sessions, “How can I possibly communicate to my Indian counterparts and US counterparts differently in the same meeting?” (They want to learn how to ‘context switch.’)
Indeed, a valid question. Some managers have found their own style to balance this cultural divide. In the beginning it wasn’t easy. The Americans were confused hearing very direct orders to the Indian counterparts by the Indian manager, while the Indian subordinates were confused to hear the Indian manager asking the US manager (rather than using statements) to get work done. (That’s because questions in some parts of India are seen as suggestions, and statements are seen as things that need to be done. While in the US, questions are seen as polite requests that will be discussed before completion, and statements are too directive and seen as rude and disrespectful. Part of the language difference is cultural, the other part could be based on the mother tongue influence.)
Anyhow, after reading Neil’s article, I have considered a few points to share with you on motivation, praise, and criticism.
While Neil suggests individual motivators, and I would agree that motivating individuals is a way to go, we need to be careful how we do it. In Kerala, and maybe it’s the communist mentality that causes this, but competition becomes higher when one is praised publicly in front of others, so typically, I praise in private, or praise someone’s behavior rather than them personally or praise a group of people about something they have done. Why do I do this? Here are two examples:
Example 1: Indian Manager Asks How to Motivate Staff
I was coaching an Indian manager with 25 plus years experience in logistics. He wanted to motivate his staff. I asked, “Could you praise individuals who have done well through achievement awards?” His response was, maybe the new generation would be privy to this, but the more experienced employees may get jealous of those who were praised, and those who get praised would come to me demanding for a raise (in his words, ‘pay hike’). Then, I suggested how about praising the team for their great work as a whole, pointing out what they did well, and noting how it’s improved the company’s bottom line (a great tip straight out of Harvard Business review). He again wasn’t happy with my suggestion. He said, “If I mention company’s bottom line, they again will come to me and demand a raise as the company is doing well.” In the end, he used indirect group motivators mixed with a bit of criticism to motivate the people to do better in what they lacked this time around.
The irony here is that though India is known as a group culture and the US an individualistic one, individual motivators tend to work better in corporations in India, while group or team motivators work better in the US.
Example 2: Prizes During Training Program
|Learning about cross-culture models and gaps with the Lewis Model- and CANDY!
Learn more about a “Cross-Cultural Approach to Learning“
Since originally writing this in 2015, I have heard a few more stories like this from other parts of India. For example, in a central Indian based MNC, during a town hall when the manager mentioned the company’s growth, one of the 1,000 attendees stood up during the question session and said, “I heard it mentioned that the company’s growth is much better than expected. When will see this reflected in our pay?”
I have actually seen that in some teams criticism done publicly motivates the team because they don’t want to be shamed. But, rather than criticize an individual, criticize a group. However, I have seen individuals criticized, too (as in the example I started this article with, where I was publicly criticized). I think the idea is, “See the manager’s job is to make us better, and if we are good, there’s no point in giving feedback, only when we do bad he needs to point it out. That’s his job.” People may be motivated by fixing their mistakes rather than pointing out the positives and building off of those (anyhow this approach does take creativity). This approach also stems from the education system as a whole. Many teachers and parents in India motivate by pointing out mistakes or areas for improvement or where to make up lost marks, and not the positive aspects. These differences are overacted on many YouTube videos where Indians have recreated scenes of how Americans parents respond to “bad” grades compared to Indian parents.
And, if you are an American in India and publicly criticized, It is very possible you will be humiliated, offended, and think it’s not professional. Whatever you do, DO NOT talk back. Just take it. Just nod and say “ha” or “yes” in typical Indian style (where “yes” doesn’t mean “I agree” but “I am listening.”) Maybe later, depending on the manager, you could speak to him or her individually. Just do not ever talk back in front of the group. You will lose face, and the respect of your other team members. I have also learned this the hard way.
Please share any other tips or contradictions to these points in the comments below. Thank you.
This blog post is based on The True Secret to Motivating Indian Teams, a recent article by Neil Miller an American expat living in Chennai. After reading his post, I became motivated myself to share some feedback based on his observations.
Author Jennifer Kumar is an American citizen who has lived as an expat in India twice for a total of 10 years. Six and a half of those ten years she spent running her own business in India providing business consulting, cross-culture training, and virtual team coaching. Based in Salt Lake City, she is also looking to work with your US based company to bridge the culture gaps to improve relationships, workflow and ROI. Contact us today.
Diplomatic Way To Say Someone’s Wrong in English
Delivering “Improvement Tips” (Bad Feedback) Positively
Motivation Across Cultures
ESL Coaching Example
Articles in the series “How to train in India”: